“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after far they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last found.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners could find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
maintaining the conviction awarded on the appellant reduce the sentence of your appellant from imprisonment for life to at least one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
It's now effectively-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different, therefore, inside our view the realized Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner by the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is effectively-settled that while considering the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to evaluate the advantage of many of the qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored via the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part with the respondent department.
This guide offers worthwhile insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is proven and also the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it's the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the varied penalties provided in law. The casual get more info or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct is just not sufficient although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful way. Read more
acquitted the appellants from all of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only done Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence plus the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were effectively aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by accomplishing an act which from the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently risky that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death in the these types of person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to your healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are no specific provisions from the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it really is important that the case proven the application on the precautionary principle where there is a menace to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations with the State in protecting the right into a clean and healthy environment.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--